We are in the Decade of Action to deliver the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and publishers have a role to play. The SDG Publishers Compact is a partnership that calls on signatories to commit to 10 actions to achieve the 17 goals. These actions range from raising awareness and promoting the SDGs among staff, suppliers and customers to dedicating financial resources to SDG projects and acquiring and promoting content focused on the principles. Many of the SDGs align with open scholarship, including quality education and reduced inequities. Supporting and working with SDG Publishers Compact members is one step you can take to achieving sustainable development.
Tag: January 2023
Open, digital editions of history books: SHMP
The Sustainable History Monograph Project (SMPH) was a three year (2018-2020) Mellon-funded initiative to publish open, digital editions of books about history from twenty-two university presses. While no longer “new”, the pilot from Longleaf Press, a University of North Carolina Press subsidiary, distinguished itself from other open access monograph programs, such as TOME and Knowledge Unlatched which explored different funding models, by focusing on a single discipline and optimizing digital technologies throughout the publication workflow. The pilot, which published about 60 open access books across 5 platforms (Internet Archive, OAPEN, ProjectMuse, Books at JSTOR and EBSCO), yielded lessons on funding, workflows and analytics which certainly informed subsequent models from MIT Press (Direct to Open), University of Michigan Press (Fund to Mission) and JSTOR (Path to Open), among others. What remains unique to SMPH is its focus on books about history, and as such titles in the collection provide a window on attributes of open digital editions – including open licenses that enable reuse, persistent identifiers for book and author, funder and publisher identification, metrics, etc. – as they pertain to historical subject matter. Analytics show increased use of collection titles over time and across the globe. What we don’t know is how author attitudes about publishing an open digital edition may have evolved, and that would be an interesting insight into the culture of the discipline.
Why persistent identifiers (PIDs) matter
In “Why PID Strategies are Having a Moment – and Why You should Care” Alice Meadows addresses the role of PIDs in scholarly communication and why they are getting more attention. Persistent identifiers for researchers (e.g. ORCID), works (DOIs) and organizations (e.g. ROR) form a network to transfer research metadata between researchers, funders, government agencies, publishers and other institutions in open, community-governed and FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) protocols. For all parties involved, adopting PIDs translates to higher accuracy and less time. Meadows quotes a couple of recent studies on the administrative time (and money) wasted on rekeying data. PID-based networks are designed to eliminate that waste.
Policy-makers and funders are paying attention to the benefits of PID-based administrative systems and networks, from the Nelson Memo in the U.S. to Plan S in Europe, and requiring their use. Researchers who adopt and use PIDs spend less time on administrative tasks and more time on actual research. The benefits of PIDs will be fully realized when more people, and systems, employ them.